Steven Leslie Pead v Prostate Cancer UK & Ors
GWCA (as successor to BBMW) is to pay 60% of all parties' costs of the total claim, to be assessed if not agreed, because BBMW's conduct and omissions significantly contributed to the circumstances giving rise to both the rectification and construction claims, and it is just and fair in all the circumstances for...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: Steven Leslie Pead; Defendant: Prostate Cancer UK; Defendant: Macmillan Cancer Support; Defendant: Cancer Research UK; Defendant: Sally Pead; Defendant: Leah Grace Jones (a child) (by her litigation friend Ricky Jones); Defendant: Joshua Pead; Defendant: The Estate of Lisa Jones Deceased (represented by Joshua Pead); Defendant: Adam Pead; Defendant: GWCA Solicitors Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Probate/trusts – Costs Application / Costs Judgment Following Trial and Joinder of Non Party for Costs
- Outcome
- Application for non-party costs order against GWCA granted in part; GWCA or its insurers to pay 60% of all parties' costs of the total claim, to be assessed if not agreed.
- Legal Topics
- Non Party Costs Orders, Rectification of Wills, Construction of Wills, Professional Negligence, Costs Apportionment
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Steven Leslie Pead
Claimant
Prostate Cancer UK
Defendant
Macmillan Cancer Support
Defendant
Cancer Research UK
Defendant
Sally Pead
Defendant
Leah Grace Jones (a child) (by her litigation friend Ricky Jones)
Defendant
Joshua Pead
Defendant
The Estate of Lisa Jones Deceased (represented by Joshua Pead)
Defendant
Adam Pead
Defendant
GWCA Solicitors Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Probate/trusts – Costs Application / Costs Judgment Following Trial and Joinder of Non Party for Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether GWCA (as successor to BBMW) should bear the costs of the claim, including rectification and construction claims, as a non-party under section 51 of the Senior Courts Act 1981
- 2 Whether the costs should be apportioned between rectification and construction claims and to what extent GWCA is responsible for each
Ratio Decidendi
GWCA (as successor to BBMW) is to pay 60% of all parties' costs of the total claim, to be assessed if not agreed, because BBMW's conduct and omissions significantly contributed to the circumstances giving rise to both the rectification and construction claims, and it is just and fair in all the circumstances for GWCA to bear this proportion of costs.
Court Disposition
Application for non-party costs order against GWCA granted in part; GWCA or its insurers to pay 60% of all parties' costs of the total claim, to be assessed if not agreed.
Orders
- GWCA or its insurers to pay 60% of all parties' costs of the total claim, to be assessed if not agreed.
- If costs not agreed by 4pm on 5 January 2024, written submissions to be filed and exchanged by 4pm on 12 January 2024.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment