Transocean Drilling UK Ltd v Providence Resources Plc
Costs are not to be considered when determining whether a claimant has beaten a Part 36 offer under CPR 36.14(1)(b); however, it would be unjust to apply the full Part 36 consequences in this case due to the claimant's unreasonable and dishonest conduct and the commercial realities. The appropriate order is that the defendant pays the claimant's costs from 30 August 2014 on the standard basis, but without indemnity costs, enhanced interest, or surcharge.
- Parties
- Claimant: Transocean Drilling U.K. Limited; Defendant: Providence Resources PLC
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 October 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Claim (costs Application) / Post Trial Costs Application After Appeal
- Outcome
- Application allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Part 36 Offers, Indemnity Costs, Interest on Judgments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Transocean Drilling U.K. Limited
Claimant
Providence Resources PLC
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Claim (costs Application) / Post Trial Costs Application After Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant beat its own Part 36 offer for the purposes of CPR 36.14(1)(b)
- 2 Whether the normal Part 36 consequences should apply or be disapplied as unjust
Ratio Decidendi
Costs are not to be considered when determining whether a claimant has beaten a Part 36 offer under CPR 36.14(1)(b); however, it would be unjust to apply the full Part 36 consequences in this case due to the claimant's unreasonable and dishonest conduct and the commercial realities. The appropriate order is that the defendant pays the claimant's costs from 30 August 2014 on the standard basis, but without indemnity costs, enhanced interest, or surcharge.
Court Disposition
Application allowed in part
Orders
- Providence to pay Transocean's costs from 30 August 2014, assessed on the standard basis.
- No indemnity costs, no enhanced interest, and no £75,000 surcharge.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment