Gorjacko, R (on the application of) v Public Prosecutor of Latvia
The appeal is dismissed as the legal issue (the Assange point) has already been decided against the appellant and a consent order withdrawing the appeal is before the court.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: Gorjacko; Defendant: Public Prosecutor of Latvia
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 October 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Assange Point, Appeal Withdrawal
Extradition Criminal Law Assange Point Appeal Withdrawal
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Gorjacko
Claimant
Public Prosecutor of Latvia
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal should proceed in light of the Assange point being decided
- 2 Whether the consent order withdrawing the appeal is valid
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is dismissed as the legal issue (the Assange point) has already been decided against the appellant and a consent order withdrawing the appeal is before the court.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal formally dismissed as withdrawn by consent order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment