Duxbury's Settlement Trusts, Re [1994] EWCA Civ 21 (21 November 1994)
Section 5(1) of the Public Trustee Act 1906 overrides a trust instrument's requirement for more than one trustee for the exercise of discretions and discretionary powers, enabling the Public Trustee, if validly appointed as sole trustee, to exercise such powers notwithstanding contrary provisions in the trust instrument.
- Citation
- [1994] EWCA Civ 21
- Parties
- Appellant: Public Trustee; Former Trustee: Barclays Bank Trust Company Limited; Settlor: Mr. John Duxbury (deceased); Respondent: Representative defendant
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 1994
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Summons (chancery Division) / Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Appointment of Trustees, Powers of Trustees, Construction of Trust Instruments, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Public Trustee
Appellant
Barclays Bank Trust Company Limited
Former Trustee
Mr. John Duxbury (deceased)
Settlor
Representative defendant
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons (chancery Division) / Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Public Trustee can be validly appointed as sole trustee under section 5(1) of the Public Trustee Act 1906 despite a trust instrument requiring more than one trustee for exercise of discretions and discretionary powers.
- 2 Whether the Public Trustee, if validly appointed as sole trustee, can exercise discretions and discretionary powers where the trust instrument prohibits such exercise by a sole trustee.
Ratio Decidendi
Section 5(1) of the Public Trustee Act 1906 overrides a trust instrument's requirement for more than one trustee for the exercise of discretions and discretionary powers, enabling the Public Trustee, if validly appointed as sole trustee, to exercise such powers notwithstanding contrary provisions in the trust instrument.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Order made by the judge in answer to question 3 discharged and replaced by an affirmative answer to question 3.
- Costs of all parties to proceedings to be raised and retained or paid out of the capital of the funds not comprised in the 1963 settlement.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment