McIlroy (Swindon) Ltd & Ors v Rannoch Investments Led & Anor
The time-bar clause in General Condition 16 did not extinguish the claimants’ rights because no claim under the policy could arise until Lenihan’s liability to the third parties was established and quantified. The actions were commenced within nine months of that event, and thus were not time-barred. The judge’s contrary construction was wrong and not supported by the authorities.
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: William McIlroy (Swindon) Limited; Appellant/claimant: Mackays Stores Limited; Appellant/claimant: Cathedral Works Organisation (Chichester) Limited; Respondent/defendant: Rannoch Investments Limited; Respondent/defendant: Quinn Insurance Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 July 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Technology and Construction Court, Preliminary Issue on Time Bar
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Public Liability Insurance, Policy Interpretation, Time Bar Clauses, Third Party Rights Against Insurers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William McIlroy (Swindon) Limited
Appellant/claimant
Mackays Stores Limited
Appellant/claimant
Cathedral Works Organisation (Chichester) Limited
Appellant/claimant
Rannoch Investments Limited
Respondent/defendant
Quinn Insurance Limited
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Technology and Construction Court, Preliminary Issue on Time Bar
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the time-bar clause (General Condition 16) in the insurance policy extinguished the claimants’ rights before their liability was established and quantified
- 2 Whether the clause was onerous and unusual and if sufficient notice was given to the insured
Ratio Decidendi
The time-bar clause in General Condition 16 did not extinguish the claimants’ rights because no claim under the policy could arise until Lenihan’s liability to the third parties was established and quantified. The actions were commenced within nine months of that event, and thus were not time-barred. The judge’s contrary construction was wrong and not supported by the authorities.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Judgment of Edwards-Stuart J set aside
- Matters remitted for further proceedings as appropriate
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment