PV v Entry Clearance Officer, Bombay
The sponsor’s income and resources at the relevant date were insufficient to meet the maintenance requirements for his dependants under the Immigration Rules, and Article 8 ECHR does not override these requirements in the absence of conspicuous unfairness or prejudice.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: PV; Appellant: SV; Appellant: MV; Appellant: BV; Respondent: Entry Clearance Officer, Bombay
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 August 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Immigration Appeal / Reconsideration
- Outcome
- Appeal of Premila Varsani allowed under Immigration Rules; other appeals dismissed under Immigration Rules and all appeals dismissed on human rights grounds.
- Legal Topics
- Maintenance Requirements, Article 8 ECHR, British Overseas Citizenship, Adequacy of Maintenance, Family Reunification
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
PV
Appellant
SV
Appellant
MV
Appellant
BV
Appellant
Entry Clearance Officer, Bombay
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Immigration Appeal / Reconsideration
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sponsor could adequately maintain his dependants under the Immigration Rules at the date of decision
- 2 Whether Article 8 ECHR overrides the maintenance requirement due to historical wrongs against British Overseas citizens
Ratio Decidendi
The sponsor’s income and resources at the relevant date were insufficient to meet the maintenance requirements for his dependants under the Immigration Rules, and Article 8 ECHR does not override these requirements in the absence of conspicuous unfairness or prejudice.
Court Disposition
Appeal of Premila Varsani allowed under Immigration Rules; other appeals dismissed under Immigration Rules and all appeals dismissed on human rights grounds.
Orders
- Premila Varsani granted entry clearance for settlement; SV, MV, MV, BV denied entry clearance; all five appellants denied relief under Article 8 ECHR.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment