Snarecroft Ltd v Quantum Securities Ltd
In the context of this lease, 'residential purposes' does not include use as a hotel. The lease contemplates use as flats or residences with a degree of permanence, not transient hotel accommodation. Use as a hotel would be a business purpose and would infringe clause 11 of the fourth schedule.
- Parties
- Claimant: Snarecroft Ltd; Defendant: Quantum Securities Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 February 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (landlord and Tenant) / Summary Judgment Application
- Outcome
- Summary judgment granted for the claimant on the construction of clause 11; use as a hotel is prohibited by the lease.
- Legal Topics
- Construction of Lease Covenants, Use of Premises, Summary Judgment, Restrictive Covenants
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Snarecroft Ltd
Claimant
Quantum Securities Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (landlord and Tenant) / Summary Judgment Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether clause 11 of the fourth schedule to the lease prohibits use of the premises as a hotel
- 2 Proper construction of 'residential purposes' in the context of the lease
Ratio Decidendi
In the context of this lease, 'residential purposes' does not include use as a hotel. The lease contemplates use as flats or residences with a degree of permanence, not transient hotel accommodation. Use as a hotel would be a business purpose and would infringe clause 11 of the fourth schedule.
Court Disposition
Summary judgment granted for the claimant on the construction of clause 11; use as a hotel is prohibited by the lease.
Orders
- Declaration that clause 11 of the fourth schedule prohibits use of the premises as a hotel
- Costs of the application to the claimant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment