Dolan (t/a Vincent & Sons) v Al-Timimi [2001] EWCA Civ 1119 (29 June 2001)

Dolan (t/a Vincent & Sons) v Al-Timimi [2001] EWCA Civ 1119 (29 June 2001)

The application for permission to appeal was refused because the appeal raised only issues of fact, not law, and there was no denial of the right of appeal or error of law by the lower courts.

Citation
[2001] EWCA Civ 1119
Parties
Claimant: Dolan t/a Vincent & Sons; Defendant/applicant: Dr Al-Timimi
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
29 June 2001
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (second Tier)
Outcome
application for permission to appeal refused
Legal Topics
Quantum Meruit, Appeals, Fact Vs Law Distinction, Judicial Conduct
Contract Law Civil Procedure Quantum Meruit Appeals Fact Vs Law Distinction Judicial Conduct

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dolan t/a Vincent & Sons

Claimant

Dr Al-Timimi

Defendant/applicant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (second Tier)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant was denied a right of appeal
  2. 2 Whether the appeal raised any error of law or only issues of fact
  3. 3 Whether alleged judicial or party misconduct affected the judgment

Ratio Decidendi

The application for permission to appeal was refused because the appeal raised only issues of fact, not law, and there was no denial of the right of appeal or error of law by the lower courts.

Court Disposition

application for permission to appeal refused

Orders

  • Permission to appeal refused