Driver v Air India Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 986 (12 August 2011)
Mr Driver is entitled to recover the sums claimed for car allowance, telephone expenses, shift allowance, and overtime as established by the evidence and the main judgment, with interest awarded at 8% from 1 February 2007 to 31 August 2008 and 5% thereafter until judgment, as Air India should have resolved the claims by early 2007.
- Citation
- [2011] EWCA Civ 986
- Parties
- Appellant / Claimant: Driver; Respondent / Defendant: Air India Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 August 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Quantum Decision After Main Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the claimant (Mr Driver) in the sum of £77,068.26 plus interest.
- Legal Topics
- Quantum of Damages, Employment Benefits, Overtime Pay, Interest on Judgment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Driver
Appellant / Claimant
Air India Ltd
Respondent / Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Quantum Decision After Main Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the correct quantum of damages and benefits owed to Mr Driver by Air India Ltd?
- 2 What is the appropriate rate and period for interest on the judgment sum?
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Driver is entitled to recover the sums claimed for car allowance, telephone expenses, shift allowance, and overtime as established by the evidence and the main judgment, with interest awarded at 8% from 1 February 2007 to 31 August 2008 and 5% thereafter until judgment, as Air India should have resolved the claims by early 2007.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the claimant (Mr Driver) in the sum of £77,068.26 plus interest.
Orders
- Air India Ltd to pay Mr Driver £77,068.26.
- Interest at 8% from 1 February 2007 to 31 August 2008.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment