Rapisarda v Colladon
The Judicial Proceedings (Regulation of Reports) Act 1926 applies to these proceedings, but the court has discretion under section 1(4)(B) to permit publication of reports. Given the nature of the proceedings and the public interest, the court directs that the media may publish reports of the proceedings as they see fit.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Agata Rapisarda; Respondent: Ivan Colladon; Applicant: Queen’s Proctor
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 May 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Family (divorce/fraud) / Judgment on Application to Dismiss Divorce Petitions and Set Aside Decrees
- Outcome
- Application granted; direction made permitting publication of reports.
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Fraud, Open Justice, Reporting Restrictions, Judicial Proceedings (regulation of Reports) Act 1926, Ancillary Relief, Financial Remedy Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Agata Rapisarda
Petitioner
Ivan Colladon
Respondent
Queen’s Proctor
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Family (divorce/fraud) / Judgment on Application to Dismiss Divorce Petitions and Set Aside Decrees
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the Judicial Proceedings (Regulation of Reports) Act 1926 restrict reporting of these proceedings?
- 2 Does the 1926 Act apply to ancillary relief (financial remedy) proceedings?
- 3 Does the court have discretion to permit broader reporting under section 1(4) of the 1926 Act?
Ratio Decidendi
The Judicial Proceedings (Regulation of Reports) Act 1926 applies to these proceedings, but the court has discretion under section 1(4)(B) to permit publication of reports. Given the nature of the proceedings and the public interest, the court directs that the media may publish reports of the proceedings as they see fit.
Court Disposition
Application granted; direction made permitting publication of reports.
Orders
- Liberty to the media and others to publish any report of the proceedings of 9 and 10 April 2014 as they see fit, pursuant to section 1(4)(B) of the 1926 Act.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment