Orderly Mind Limited v Queue-It ApS (incorporated under the laws of Denmark)

Orderly Mind Limited v Queue-It ApS (incorporated under the laws of Denmark)

Permission granted to amend infringement case; defendant required to serve responsive SOCI. Defendant's costs budget revised with reductions to figures sought. Additional security for costs ordered in sum of £343k, with claimant to elect between monthly payments or provision of debenture supported by undertakings from Mr King. Directions to trial revised; parties to file submissions on costs before final order.

Parties
Claimant: Orderly Mind Limited; Defendant: Queue-It ApS; Third Party: The Fair Queue People Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
19 February 2025
Procedural Posture
Patent Infringement and Counterclaim for Invalidity and Unjustified Threats / Interlocutory Judgment on Applications for Amendment, Costs Budget Revision, Security for Costs, and Directions to Trial
Outcome
Applications determined: permission to amend granted, costs budget revised, additional security for costs ordered, directions to trial revised.
Legal Topics
Patent Infringement, Costs Budgeting, Security for Costs, Pleadings Amendment, Directions to Trial
Intellectual Property Civil Procedure Patent Infringement Costs Budgeting Security for Costs Pleadings Amendment Directions to Trial

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Orderly Mind Limited

Claimant

Queue-It ApS

Defendant

The Fair Queue People Limited

Third Party

Procedural Posture

Patent Infringement and Counterclaim for Invalidity and Unjustified Threats / Interlocutory Judgment on Applications for Amendment, Costs Budget Revision, Security for Costs, and Directions to Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether claimant may amend its infringement case
  2. 2 Revision of defendant's costs budget
  3. 3 Appropriate quantum and form of additional security for costs

Ratio Decidendi

Permission granted to amend infringement case; defendant required to serve responsive SOCI. Defendant's costs budget revised with reductions to figures sought. Additional security for costs ordered in sum of £343k, with claimant to elect between monthly payments or provision of debenture supported by undertakings from Mr King. Directions to trial revised; parties to file submissions on costs before final order.

Court Disposition

Applications determined: permission to amend granted, costs budget revised, additional security for costs ordered, directions to trial revised.

Orders

  • Claimant permitted to amend infringement case.
  • Defendant to serve responsive statement of case on infringement.