QX, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 1463 (21 October 2025)

QX, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 1463 (21 October 2025)

The convictions must be quashed because the statutory preconditions are satisfied: the appellant was convicted under section 10(3) and the Temporary Exclusion Order was quashed ab initio, making the convictions unsustainable.

Citation
[2025] EWCA Crim 1463
Parties
Respondent: Rex; Appellant: QX
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
21 October 2025
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
appeal allowed; convictions quashed
Legal Topics
Temporary Exclusion Order, Quashing of Conviction, Appeal Procedure, Financial Orders, Anonymity
Criminal Law Counter Terrorism Temporary Exclusion Order Quashing of Conviction Appeal Procedure Financial Orders Anonymity

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Respondent

QX

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the conviction under section 10(3) of the Counter Terrorism and Security Act 2015 should be quashed following the quashing ab initio of the underlying Temporary Exclusion Order

Ratio Decidendi

The convictions must be quashed because the statutory preconditions are satisfied: the appellant was convicted under section 10(3) and the Temporary Exclusion Order was quashed ab initio, making the convictions unsustainable.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed; convictions quashed

Orders

  • Convictions quashed
  • Suspended sentence order quashed