Kay, R v [2017] EWCA Crim 647 (23 May 2017)
A defendant suffering from schizophrenia who voluntarily intoxicates himself cannot rely on diminished responsibility unless the abnormality of mental functioning arises from the recognised medical condition and not solely from voluntary intoxication. The sentencing judge's approach to starting points, aggravating features, and credit for plea was correct in law and not excessive given the facts.
- Citation
- [2017] EWCA Crim 647
- Parties
- Respondent: R; 1st Appellant: Joyce; 2nd Appellant: Kay
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 May 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed; leave to appeal against sentence refused for Kay; minimum term for Joyce upheld.
- Legal Topics
- Diminished Responsibility, Voluntary Intoxication, Sentencing, Murder, Manslaughter, Mental Health Act 1983, Homicide Act 1957
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R
Respondent
Joyce
1st Appellant
Kay
2nd Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether voluntary intoxication precludes reliance on diminished responsibility under section 2(1) of the Homicide Act 1957
- 2 Whether the sentencing judge gave sufficient credit for guilty pleas
- 3 Assessment of residual culpability where mental illness and substance abuse coexist
Ratio Decidendi
A defendant suffering from schizophrenia who voluntarily intoxicates himself cannot rely on diminished responsibility unless the abnormality of mental functioning arises from the recognised medical condition and not solely from voluntary intoxication. The sentencing judge's approach to starting points, aggravating features, and credit for plea was correct in law and not excessive given the facts.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed; leave to appeal against sentence refused for Kay; minimum term for Joyce upheld.
Orders
- Kay's conviction and sentence upheld; leave to appeal against sentence refused.
- Joyce's minimum term of nine years confirmed; no further reduction for guilty plea.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment