G v R
The inference that English law governs the arbitration agreement is negated by the fact that French law, as the law of the seat, provides by established case law that the arbitration agreement is governed by French substantive rules applicable to international arbitration. Therefore, English law does not govern the arbitration agreement, and England is not the proper forum for the anti-suit injunction, as substantial justice can be done in France.
- Parties
- Claimant: G; Defendant: R
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Arbitration Claim / Judgment After Trial of Application for Final Anti Suit Relief
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
- Legal Topics
- Governing Law of Arbitration Agreements, Anti Suit Injunctions, Forum Conveniens, Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
G
Claimant
R
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Arbitration Claim / Judgment After Trial of Application for Final Anti Suit Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the governing law of the arbitration agreement?
- 2 Is England the proper forum for the claim to an anti-suit injunction?
Ratio Decidendi
The inference that English law governs the arbitration agreement is negated by the fact that French law, as the law of the seat, provides by established case law that the arbitration agreement is governed by French substantive rules applicable to international arbitration. Therefore, English law does not govern the arbitration agreement, and England is not the proper forum for the anti-suit injunction, as substantial justice can be done in France.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Orders
- Claim for anti-suit injunction dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment