Musawi v RE International (UK) Ltd & Ors

Musawi v RE International (UK) Ltd & Ors

The arbitration award is enforceable as it was made pursuant to a valid arbitration agreement under English law, covered all disputes between the parties regarding the Wembley land, and bound the necessary parties, including REI. The claimant is entitled to a 60.4% beneficial interest in the Wembley land and proceeds. The 1990 agreement is inadmissible due to lack of stamping and cannot be relied upon by the defendants. The alleged August 2002 agreement was not binding as its terms were not finalised. The counterclaim fails.

Parties
Claimant: Sayyed Mohammed Musawi; Defendant: R. E. International (UK) Ltd; Defendant: Sayyed Mohammed Ali Shahrestani; Defendant: Sayyed Reza Shahrestani; Defendant: Sayyed Saleh Shahrestani
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
14 December 2007
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Claim allowed, counterclaim dismissed
Legal Topics
Enforcement of Arbitration Awards, Beneficial Ownership, Applicable Law of Contract, Stamp Duty and Admissibility of Documents, Resulting Trusts, Estoppel by Convention
Arbitration Trusts Property Law Conflict of Laws Enforcement of Arbitration Awards Beneficial Ownership Applicable Law of Contract Stamp Duty and Admissibility of Documents +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sayyed Mohammed Musawi

Claimant

R. E. International (UK) Ltd

Defendant

Sayyed Mohammed Ali Shahrestani

Defendant

Sayyed Reza Shahrestani

Defendant

Sayyed Saleh Shahrestani

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the arbitration award in favour of the claimant is enforceable against the defendants
  2. 2 Whether the claimant has a beneficial interest in the Wembley land and in what proportion
  3. 3 Whether the 1990 agreement is admissible and its effect

Ratio Decidendi

The arbitration award is enforceable as it was made pursuant to a valid arbitration agreement under English law, covered all disputes between the parties regarding the Wembley land, and bound the necessary parties, including REI. The claimant is entitled to a 60.4% beneficial interest in the Wembley land and proceeds. The 1990 agreement is inadmissible due to lack of stamping and cannot be relied upon by the defendants. The alleged August 2002 agreement was not binding as its terms were not finalised. The counterclaim fails.

Court Disposition

Claim allowed, counterclaim dismissed

Orders

  • The arbitration award in favour of the claimant is upheld and enforceable.
  • The claimant is entitled to a 60.4% beneficial interest in the Wembley land and proceeds.