R v A
The children were habitually resident in the USA at the time of their removal on 28 August 2012. The father did not consent to or acquiesce in their removal or retention in England. The removal was surreptitious and deceptive. The mother failed to establish any grave risk of harm if the children were returned. Therefore, the children must be returned to the USA pursuant to the Hague Convention.
- Parties
- Applicant: R; Respondent: A
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 March 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Hague Convention Child Abduction Proceedings / Judgment After Full Hearing
- Outcome
- Children to be returned to the USA pursuant to the Hague Convention.
- Legal Topics
- Child Abduction, Habitual Residence, Parental Consent, Hague Convention, Inherent Jurisdiction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R
Applicant
A
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Hague Convention Child Abduction Proceedings / Judgment After Full Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the children were habitually resident in the USA or England at the time of removal
- 2 Whether the father consented to or acquiesced in the removal or retention of the children in England
- 3 Whether there is a grave risk of harm to the children if returned to the USA
Ratio Decidendi
The children were habitually resident in the USA at the time of their removal on 28 August 2012. The father did not consent to or acquiesce in their removal or retention in England. The removal was surreptitious and deceptive. The mother failed to establish any grave risk of harm if the children were returned. Therefore, the children must be returned to the USA pursuant to the Hague Convention.
Court Disposition
Children to be returned to the USA pursuant to the Hague Convention.
Orders
- Order for the summary return of the children to the USA.
- If M had not been habitually resident in the USA, she would have been returned under the inherent jurisdiction.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment