Deyemi & Anor, R v [2007] EWCA Crim 2060 (13 August 2007)
Section 5(1) of the Firearms Act 1968 creates an absolute offence of strict liability; the prosecution need only prove possession of the object and that it is a prohibited weapon, regardless of the defendant's knowledge or belief as to its nature. This interpretation does not contravene Articles 6 or 7 of the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2007] EWCA Crim 2060
- Parties
- Appellant: R; Respondent: Danny Deyemi; Respondent: Annie Edwards
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 August 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Strict Liability, Firearms Offences, Mens Rea, European Convention on Human Rights, Interpretation of Statutes
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R
Appellant
Danny Deyemi
Respondent
Annie Edwards
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 5(1) of the Firearms Act 1968 creates a strict liability offence
- 2 Whether lack of knowledge of the nature of the object provides a defence
- 3 Whether strict liability under section 5(1) contravenes Articles 6 and/or 7 of the European Convention on Human Rights
Ratio Decidendi
Section 5(1) of the Firearms Act 1968 creates an absolute offence of strict liability; the prosecution need only prove possession of the object and that it is a prohibited weapon, regardless of the defendant's knowledge or belief as to its nature. This interpretation does not contravene Articles 6 or 7 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Extension of representation order for solicitor and junior counsel granted for pursuing leave to the House of Lords
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment