R v R
The Court of Appeal held that it had jurisdiction to hear the appeal because the prosecution had made a valid acquittal agreement under section 58(8) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003. However, the trial judge's refusal to grant leave to adduce late expert evidence was a reasonable exercise of discretion, given the Crown's serious procedural failures and the prejudice to the defendant. The application for leave to appeal was therefore dismissed.
- Parties
- Appellant: R; Respondent: R
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 February 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against a Crown Court Ruling
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Prosecution Appeals, Evidentiary Rulings, Expert Evidence, Case Management, Judicial Discretion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R
Appellant
R
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against a Crown Court Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court of Appeal had jurisdiction under section 58 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 to hear the prosecution's appeal against the refusal to admit expert evidence
- 2 Whether the trial judge's refusal to grant leave to adduce late expert evidence was unreasonable
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal held that it had jurisdiction to hear the appeal because the prosecution had made a valid acquittal agreement under section 58(8) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003. However, the trial judge's refusal to grant leave to adduce late expert evidence was a reasonable exercise of discretion, given the Crown's serious procedural failures and the prejudice to the defendant. The application for leave to appeal was therefore dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment