Bashir v Bashir
Even if the claimant had regained capacity, he could not enter into a binding settlement agreement while under the jurisdiction of the Court of Protection; no valid agreement was reached, and the charging order and judgment debt remain enforceable, justifying an order for sale.
- Parties
- Claimant: Jhangir Mohammed Bashir; Claimant's Litigation Friend: Samantha Louise Hamilton; Defendant: Rabia Bashir; Defendant's Litigation Friend: Satpal Singh Bhatt
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 July 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (part 8 Claim) / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Order for sale granted
- Legal Topics
- Order for Sale, Charging Order, Mental Capacity, Court of Protection, Settlement Agreement Validity
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jhangir Mohammed Bashir
Claimant
Samantha Louise Hamilton
Claimant's Litigation Friend
Rabia Bashir
Defendant
Satpal Singh Bhatt
Defendant's Litigation Friend
Procedural Posture
Civil (part 8 Claim) / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant had capacity to enter into a binding settlement agreement
- 2 Whether a valid settlement agreement was reached
- 3 Effect of Court of Protection jurisdiction on claimant's ability to settle
Ratio Decidendi
Even if the claimant had regained capacity, he could not enter into a binding settlement agreement while under the jurisdiction of the Court of Protection; no valid agreement was reached, and the charging order and judgment debt remain enforceable, justifying an order for sale.
Court Disposition
Order for sale granted
Orders
- Order for sale of 7 St Heliers Road, Leyton, London E10 6BD; terms to be determined if not agreed by parties
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment