Esposito, R. v

Esposito, R. v

The appellant's progress in custody, while very good and impressive, does not meet the high threshold of exceptionality required for a reduction in the minimum term; insufficient evidence of exceptional progress and risk assessment remains at medium.

Parties
Respondent: Regina; Appellant: Raffaele Esposito
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
05 March 2021
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Murder, Life Imprisonment, Minimum Term, Exceptional Progress, Sentencing Review, Transitional Provisions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Respondent

Raffaele Esposito

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the appellant's exceptional progress in custody merits a reduction in the minimum term for life imprisonment under Schedule 22 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant's progress in custody, while very good and impressive, does not meet the high threshold of exceptionality required for a reduction in the minimum term; insufficient evidence of exceptional progress and risk assessment remains at medium.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed