Scottish & NEWCAstle Plc v Raguz
The implied covenant under s.24(1)(b) Land Registration Act 1925 is a contract of indemnity, not guarantee, and is not discharged by assignor's conduct. Raguz is liable for rent and VAT as covered by statutory notices, and payment by assignor was sufficiently established. The costs order was within the judge's discretion.
- Parties
- Respondent: Scottish & Newcastle PLC; Appellant: Raguz
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 July 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Summary Judgment and Costs Order
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Leasehold Assignment, Indemnity Vs Guarantee, Summary Judgment, Costs Allocation, VAT Liability on Rent
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Scottish & Newcastle PLC
Respondent
Raguz
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Summary Judgment and Costs Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the covenant implied by s.24(1)(b) Land Registration Act 1925 is a contract of indemnity or guarantee
- 2 Extent of liability under the implied covenant, including defaults caused or prolonged by assignor
- 3 Liability for VAT on rent under the implied covenant
Ratio Decidendi
The implied covenant under s.24(1)(b) Land Registration Act 1925 is a contract of indemnity, not guarantee, and is not discharged by assignor's conduct. Raguz is liable for rent and VAT as covered by statutory notices, and payment by assignor was sufficiently established. The costs order was within the judge's discretion.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Declaration of liability to indemnify for £31,764.08
- Judgment for payment of £31,764.08 plus interest at 6.5% from 5 July 2001
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment