London Baggage Company v Railtrack Plc (No. 1) [2000] EWHC 459 (Ch) (17 April 2000)

London Baggage Company v Railtrack Plc (No. 1) [2000] EWHC 459 (Ch) (17 April 2000)

Objectively assessed, the conduct and intentions of the parties were inconsistent with the creation of a new periodic tenancy; the claimant remained as a tenant at will after the original tenancy ended, and the payment and retention of rent did not alter this status.

Citation
[2000] EWHC 459 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant: London Baggage Company, Charing Cross Limited; Defendant: Railtrack Plc
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
17 April 2000
Procedural Posture
Civil / Trial Judgment
Outcome
Claim dismissed; counterclaim for declarations granted; damages and costs stayed pending determination of statutory compensation entitlement and quantum.
Legal Topics
Periodic Tenancy, Tenancy at Will, Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, Statutory Compensation, Possession Proceedings
Landlord and Tenant Property Law Periodic Tenancy Tenancy at Will Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 Statutory Compensation Possession Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

London Baggage Company, Charing Cross Limited

Claimant

Railtrack Plc

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Trial Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant occupies Unit 26 under a periodic tenancy protected by Part II of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 or as a tenant at will after the termination of the original tenancy
  2. 2 Whether the payment and retention of rent after the tenancy's termination created a new periodic tenancy
  3. 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to statutory compensation under section 37 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954

Ratio Decidendi

Objectively assessed, the conduct and intentions of the parties were inconsistent with the creation of a new periodic tenancy; the claimant remained as a tenant at will after the original tenancy ended, and the payment and retention of rent did not alter this status.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed; counterclaim for declarations granted; damages and costs stayed pending determination of statutory compensation entitlement and quantum.

Orders

  • Declaration that claimant occupied Unit 26 as tenant at will after 29 September 1998.
  • Declaration that tenancy at will was terminated and defendant entitled to possession no later than 8 May.