NORTH WARWICKSHIRE BOROUGH COUNCIL v RAJAN NAIDU
The defendant admitted two breaches of the interim injunction. Both breaches were deliberate but caused little or no harm. The defendant's early admissions, good character, and time already spent in custody justified making no further penalty order. The time in custody exceeded the fines that would have been imposed.
- Parties
- Claimant: North Warwickshire Borough Council; Defendant: Rajan Naidu
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 May 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Contempt of Court Proceedings / Judgment After Admission of Breach
- Outcome
- No order on penalty due to time served in custody; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Injunction, Protest Law, Sentencing for Contempt
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
North Warwickshire Borough Council
Claimant
Rajan Naidu
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Contempt of Court Proceedings / Judgment After Admission of Breach
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant breached the terms of the interim injunction
- 2 Appropriate penalty for admitted breaches of the injunction
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant admitted two breaches of the interim injunction. Both breaches were deliberate but caused little or no harm. The defendant's early admissions, good character, and time already spent in custody justified making no further penalty order. The time in custody exceeded the fines that would have been imposed.
Court Disposition
No order on penalty due to time served in custody; no order as to costs.
Orders
- No financial penalty imposed for either breach of injunction.
- Time spent in custody (six days) recorded as equivalent to a 12-day sentence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment