Chaudhary v Specialist Training Authority Appeal Panel & Ors [2005] EWCA Civ 282 (16 March 2005)
The Employment Tribunal has no jurisdiction to hear the appellant's complaint of race discrimination because section 54(2) of the Race Relations Act 1976 applies where an appeal or proceedings in the nature of an appeal may be brought under any enactment, which includes the statutory appeal process under the 1995 Order. The statutory appeal and judicial review together provide an effective remedy compliant with Article 6 ECHR.
- Citation
- [2005] EWCA Civ 282
- Parties
- Appellant: Rajendra Chaudhary; Respondents: Specialist Training Authority Appeal Panel & Ors
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Race Discrimination, Jurisdiction of Employment Tribunals, Statutory Appeals, Article 6 ECHR, Judicial Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rajendra Chaudhary
Appellant
Specialist Training Authority Appeal Panel & Ors
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal had jurisdiction to hear a complaint of race discrimination against the Specialist Training Authority Appeal Panel under the Race Relations Act 1976, section 12, in light of section 54(2)
- 2 Whether the appeal procedure under the European Specialist Medical Qualifications Order 1995 constitutes an 'enactment' for the purposes of section 54(2)
- 3 Whether the statutory appeal and judicial review provide an effective remedy compliant with Article 6 ECHR
Ratio Decidendi
The Employment Tribunal has no jurisdiction to hear the appellant's complaint of race discrimination because section 54(2) of the Race Relations Act 1976 applies where an appeal or proceedings in the nature of an appeal may be brought under any enactment, which includes the statutory appeal process under the 1995 Order. The statutory appeal and judicial review together provide an effective remedy compliant with Article 6 ECHR.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appellant to pay the respondent's costs, subject to determination under regulation 127 of the Civil Legal Aid (General) Regulations 1989, now the Community Legal Service Regulations 2000.
- Application for leave to appeal to the House of Lords refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment