Super-Max Offshore Holdings & Anor v Malhotra

Super-Max Offshore Holdings & Anor v Malhotra

The Defendant's breaches of seven court orders, false statements, communications in breach of orders, and interference with witnesses were deliberate, serious, and prejudicial, justifying a total custodial sentence of 15 months. There was no contrition, apology, or cooperation from the Defendant. The Claimants are entitled to indemnity costs, with an interim payment of £1.3 million to be paid into court pending appeal.

Parties
Claimant: Super-Max Offshore Holdings; Claimant: Actis Consumer Grooming Products Limited; Defendant: Rakesh Malhotra
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
06 May 2020
Procedural Posture
Contempt of Court Proceedings / Sentencing and Consequential Orders
Outcome
Defendant found in contempt of court; sentenced to 15 months' imprisonment (stayed pending appeal); interim costs order granted.
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, Breach of Court Orders, False Statements, Witness Interference, Costs
Civil Procedure Commercial Law Contempt of Court Breach of Court Orders False Statements Witness Interference Costs

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Super-Max Offshore Holdings

Claimant

Actis Consumer Grooming Products Limited

Claimant

Rakesh Malhotra

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Contempt of Court Proceedings / Sentencing and Consequential Orders

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Defendant's breaches of court orders and related conduct amount to contempt of court
  2. 2 Appropriate sentence for multiple contempts
  3. 3 Whether delay or prejudice affects sentencing

Ratio Decidendi

The Defendant's breaches of seven court orders, false statements, communications in breach of orders, and interference with witnesses were deliberate, serious, and prejudicial, justifying a total custodial sentence of 15 months. There was no contrition, apology, or cooperation from the Defendant. The Claimants are entitled to indemnity costs, with an interim payment of £1.3 million to be paid into court pending appeal.

Court Disposition

Defendant found in contempt of court; sentenced to 15 months' imprisonment (stayed pending appeal); interim costs order granted.

Orders

  • Defendant sentenced to 15 months' imprisonment for contempt, stayed pending appeal.
  • Defendant to pay £1.3 million as interim costs into court within 28 days, pending outcome of appeal.