Templeton Insurance Ltd & Anor v Brunswick & Ors [2012] EWHC 1522 (Ch) (31 May 2012)

Templeton Insurance Ltd & Anor v Brunswick & Ors [2012] EWHC 1522 (Ch) (31 May 2012)

Actual dishonesty by the first defendant in breach of contract and fiduciary duty constitutes fraud or fraudulent breach of trust, which survives bankruptcy discharge under s.281(3) Insolvency Act 1986. The second defendant is not liable for knowing receipt absent sufficient actual knowledge rendering retention unconscionable.

Citation
[2012] EWHC 1522 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant: Templeton Insurance Limited; Claimant: Knox D'Arcy Operations Limited; Defendant: Ralph Stephen Brunswick; Defendant: Elizabeth Jane Brunswick; Defendant: Jonathan Ronald Booth
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
31 May 2012
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Claim against first defendant succeeds; claim against second defendant fails; third defendant neutral.
Legal Topics
Fraud, Dishonest Breach of Contract, Dishonest Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Knowing Receipt, Unjust Enrichment, Bankruptcy Discharge Exceptions
Contract Law Equity Company Law Insolvency Fraud Dishonest Breach of Contract Dishonest Breach of Fiduciary Duty Knowing Receipt +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 7 Authorities cited 22 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Templeton Insurance Limited

Claimant

Knox D'Arcy Operations Limited

Claimant

Ralph Stephen Brunswick

Defendant

Elizabeth Jane Brunswick

Defendant

Jonathan Ronald Booth

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Final Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the first defendant committed dishonest breaches of contract and fiduciary duty amounting to fraud or fraudulent breach of trust
  2. 2 Whether the second defendant is liable for knowing receipt and unjust enrichment
  3. 3 Whether the claims survive bankruptcy discharge under s.281(3) Insolvency Act 1986

Ratio Decidendi

Actual dishonesty by the first defendant in breach of contract and fiduciary duty constitutes fraud or fraudulent breach of trust, which survives bankruptcy discharge under s.281(3) Insolvency Act 1986. The second defendant is not liable for knowing receipt absent sufficient actual knowledge rendering retention unconscionable.

Court Disposition

Claim against first defendant succeeds; claim against second defendant fails; third defendant neutral.

Orders

  • First defendant to repay £499,830.38 to claimants.
  • No order against second defendant.