Saxena v Rushforth & Anor [2002] EWCA Civ 1129 (23 July 2002)

The application for permission to appeal is adjourned and the matter remitted to Jacob J to provide reasons for his order of 18 January 2002, as the absence of reasons makes it unsatisfactory to determine the application at this stage.

Citation: [2002] EWCA Civ 1129
Parties: Applicant: Ram Pratap Saxena; Defendant: Beverly Rushforth; Defendant: Pricewaterhouse Cooper
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Judgment Date: 23 July 2002
Procedural Posture: Civil Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Permission to Appeal
Outcome: Application adjourned
Legal Topics: Extension of Time, Permission to Appeal, Grepe V Loam Order, Transfer of Proceedings, Adequacy of Judicial Reasons

Civil Procedure Bankruptcy Extension of Time Permission to Appeal Grepe V Loam Order Transfer of Proceedings Adequacy of Judicial Reasons

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2

Parties

Ram Pratap Saxena

Applicant

Beverly Rushforth

Defendant

Pricewaterhouse Cooper

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Permission to Appeal

Legal Issues

1 Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time and permission to appeal the order of Jacob J dated 18 January 2002
2 Whether the absence of reasons from Jacob J's order justifies remitting the case for further explanation

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Application adjourned

Orders

Application for extension of time and permission to appeal adjourned pending provision of reasons by Jacob J
No order for costs