FHR European Ventures LLP & Ors v Mankarious & Ors [2016] EWHC 359 (Ch) (02 March 2016)
Mr Mankarious and Cedar Ltd were in breach of fiduciary duty by receiving monies derived from the Fee, and are liable as constructive trustees and for knowing receipt. The claimants are entitled to a proportionate share in the property and life insurance policies based on actual contributions from the Fee, but not for incidental costs or the full deposit where non-Fee funds were used. Re Hallett, not Re Oatway, applies to tracing in this case, limiting recovery to amounts directly traceable to the Fee.
- Citation
- [2016] EWHC 359 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: FHR European Ventures LLP; Claimant: Kingdom Hotels International; Claimant: Kingdom 5-KR-176, LTD; Claimant: Fairmont Hotels and Resorts Inc; Claimant: Fairmont Dubai Holdings (Bermuda) Ltd; Claimant: Bank of Scotland PLC; Claimant: Uberior Ventures Limited; Defendant: Ramsey Neil Mankarious; Defendant: Cedar Capital Partners LLC; Defendant: Cedar Capital Partners Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 March 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Chancery Division Civil Claim / Post Trial Application for Consequential Relief
- Outcome
- Application granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Trust, Fiduciary Duties, Tracing, Knowing Receipt, Equitable Compensation, Proprietary Remedies
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
FHR European Ventures LLP
Claimant
Kingdom Hotels International
Claimant
Kingdom 5-KR-176, LTD
Claimant
Fairmont Hotels and Resorts Inc
Claimant
Fairmont Dubai Holdings (Bermuda) Ltd
Claimant
Bank of Scotland PLC
Claimant
Uberior Ventures Limited
Claimant
Ramsey Neil Mankarious
Defendant
Cedar Capital Partners LLC
Defendant
Cedar Capital Partners Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Chancery Division Civil Claim / Post Trial Application for Consequential Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Mankarious and Cedar Ltd were in breach of fiduciary duty by receiving monies derived from the Fee
- 2 Whether claimants are entitled to a proportionate share or charge over the property purchased with misapplied funds
- 3 Whether claimants are entitled to a share in life insurance policies funded in part by misapplied funds
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Mankarious and Cedar Ltd were in breach of fiduciary duty by receiving monies derived from the Fee, and are liable as constructive trustees and for knowing receipt. The claimants are entitled to a proportionate share in the property and life insurance policies based on actual contributions from the Fee, but not for incidental costs or the full deposit where non-Fee funds were used. Re Hallett, not Re Oatway, applies to tracing in this case, limiting recovery to amounts directly traceable to the Fee.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part
Orders
- Declaration that claimants are entitled to a proportionate share in the property at 41 Lyndhurst Road, London NW3 5PE, based on actual Fee-derived contributions to the deposit and completion payment, excluding non-Fee funds and incidental costs.
- Declaration that claimants are entitled to a pro rata beneficial interest in two life insurance policies to the extent premiums were paid from the Fee.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment