FHR European Ventures LLP & Ors v Mankarious & Ors
Mr Mankarious and Cedar Ltd were in breach of fiduciary duty by receiving monies derived from the Fee, and hold such sums on constructive trust for the claimants. The claimants are entitled to trace into assets acquired with the Fee, but only to the extent that Fee monies were actually used, applying the Re Hallett principle rather than Re Oatway. The claimants are entitled to monetary judgments for sums received by Mr Mankarious and Cedar Ltd, and to a pro rata beneficial interest in the life insurance policies to the extent premiums were paid from the Fee.
- Parties
- Claimant: FHR European Ventures LLP; Claimant: Kingdom Hotels International; Claimant: Kingdom 5-KR-176, LTD; Claimant: Fairmont Hotels and Resorts Inc; Claimant: Fairmont Dubai Holdings (Bermuda) Ltd; Claimant: Bank of Scotland PLC; Claimant: Uberior Ventures Limited; Defendant: Ramsey Neil Mankarious; Defendant: Cedar Capital Partners LLC; Defendant: Cedar Capital Partners Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 March 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Trial Application for Account, Tracing, and Monetary Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted in part; declarations and monetary judgments made as specified.
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Trust, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Tracing, Knowing Receipt, Equitable Remedies
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
FHR European Ventures LLP
Claimant
Kingdom Hotels International
Claimant
Kingdom 5-KR-176, LTD
Claimant
Fairmont Hotels and Resorts Inc
Claimant
Fairmont Dubai Holdings (Bermuda) Ltd
Claimant
Bank of Scotland PLC
Claimant
Uberior Ventures Limited
Claimant
Ramsey Neil Mankarious
Defendant
Cedar Capital Partners LLC
Defendant
Cedar Capital Partners Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Trial Application for Account, Tracing, and Monetary Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Mankarious and Cedar Ltd were in breach of fiduciary duty in receiving monies derived from the Fee
- 2 Whether the claimants are entitled to trace the Fee into the purchase of the Property and other assets
- 3 Whether the claimants are entitled to a proportionate share or charge over the Property and life insurance policies
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Mankarious and Cedar Ltd were in breach of fiduciary duty by receiving monies derived from the Fee, and hold such sums on constructive trust for the claimants. The claimants are entitled to trace into assets acquired with the Fee, but only to the extent that Fee monies were actually used, applying the Re Hallett principle rather than Re Oatway. The claimants are entitled to monetary judgments for sums received by Mr Mankarious and Cedar Ltd, and to a pro rata beneficial interest in the life insurance policies to the extent premiums were paid from the Fee.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part; declarations and monetary judgments made as specified.
Orders
- Declaration that claimants are entitled to a proportionate share in the Property based on Fee-derived funds used for purchase.
- Declaration that claimants have a pro rata beneficial interest in the life insurance policies to the extent of premiums paid from the Fee.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment