Ahmed & Anor v R
The appeal fails because alleged torture did not impact the trial, there was no unlawful rendition or UK complicity, Professor Clarke's evidence was properly admitted, jury directions on membership and territoriality were appropriate, and cross-admissibility issues did not affect the safety of the convictions.
- Parties
- Appellant: Rangzieb Ahmed; Appellant: Habib Ahmed; Respondent: The Queen
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 February 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal against conviction dismissed; sentence varied in one respect for Habib Ahmed.
- Legal Topics
- Terrorism, Abuse of Process, Evidence Admissibility, International Law, Membership of Proscribed Organisations, Complicity in Torture
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rangzieb Ahmed
Appellant
Habib Ahmed
Appellant
The Queen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether prosecution should be stayed for abuse of process due to alleged torture and complicity by UK authorities
- 2 Admissibility of expert evidence from Professor Clarke
- 3 Proper direction on 'membership' under section 11 of the Terrorism Act 2000
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal fails because alleged torture did not impact the trial, there was no unlawful rendition or UK complicity, Professor Clarke's evidence was properly admitted, jury directions on membership and territoriality were appropriate, and cross-admissibility issues did not affect the safety of the convictions.
Court Disposition
Appeal against conviction dismissed; sentence varied in one respect for Habib Ahmed.
Orders
- All grounds of appeal against conviction fail; convictions are safe.
- Sentence for Habib Ahmed varied to deduct 28 days from count 10; appeal allowed to that extent only.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment