XXX v Persons Unknown
The interim injunction is continued and modified because the claimant has demonstrated an overwhelming case for relief, the defendants have not engaged, and privacy and anonymisation are necessary to prevent further criminal objectives and protect confidentiality.
- Parties
- Claimant: XXX; Defendants: Persons Unknown
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 April 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Injunction Application / Interim Relief, Return Date Hearing
- Outcome
- Interim injunction continued and modified; claimant anonymised; hearing held in private; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Ransomware, Interim Injunctions, Anonymisation, Reporting Restrictions, Non Disclosure Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXX
Claimant
Persons Unknown
Defendants
Procedural Posture
Injunction Application / Interim Relief, Return Date Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to continue and modify an interim injunction against persons unknown following a ransomware attack
- 2 Whether the hearing should be conducted in private and the claimant anonymised
- 3 Whether retrospective permission for redactions should be granted
Ratio Decidendi
The interim injunction is continued and modified because the claimant has demonstrated an overwhelming case for relief, the defendants have not engaged, and privacy and anonymisation are necessary to prevent further criminal objectives and protect confidentiality.
Court Disposition
Interim injunction continued and modified; claimant anonymised; hearing held in private; costs reserved.
Orders
- Continuation of interim injunction prohibiting use or disclosure of stolen data
- Claimant anonymised in proceedings
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment