Moulder, R. v [2023] EWCA Crim 49 (18 January 2023)
The original sentence for the second rape was unduly lenient as the judge failed to apply the correct starting point under the Sentencing Council Guidelines for a category 2A offence and gave no reason for departing from the guidelines. The sentence was increased to 12 years to reflect the seriousness of the offending, aggravating and mitigating factors, and the principle of totality.
- Citation
- [2023] EWCA Crim 49
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Offender: Samuel Anthony Moulder
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 January 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal (attorney General's Reference) / Application for Leave and Substantive Hearing
- Outcome
- Reference allowed in part; sentence increased
- Legal Topics
- Rape, Sentencing, Unduly Lenient Sentence, Attorney General's Reference, Totality, Sentencing Guidelines
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Samuel Anthony Moulder
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal (attorney General's Reference) / Application for Leave and Substantive Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the original sentence imposed for two counts of rape was unduly lenient
- 2 Proper categorisation of offences under Sentencing Council Guidelines
- 3 Appropriate application of aggravating and mitigating factors
Ratio Decidendi
The original sentence for the second rape was unduly lenient as the judge failed to apply the correct starting point under the Sentencing Council Guidelines for a category 2A offence and gave no reason for departing from the guidelines. The sentence was increased to 12 years to reflect the seriousness of the offending, aggravating and mitigating factors, and the principle of totality.
Court Disposition
Reference allowed in part; sentence increased
Orders
- Sentence on count 2 (second rape) increased from 8 years to 12 years' imprisonment
- Sentence on count 1 (first rape) remains at 5 years, concurrent with count 2
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment