Adekunle, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 900 (27 June 2025)
The five-year driving disqualification was manifestly excessive and not necessary for punishment or public protection, given the appellant's low culpability and personal mitigation. A two-year disqualification is appropriate.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] EWCA Crim 900
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Appellant: Rapheal Adekunle
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 June 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Sentence Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Causing Death by Careless Driving, Driving While Uninsured, Sentencing, Driving Disqualification
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Rapheal Adekunle
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Sentence Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the five-year driving disqualification imposed was manifestly excessive given the appellant's culpability and circumstances.
Ratio Decidendi
The five-year driving disqualification was manifestly excessive and not necessary for punishment or public protection, given the appellant's low culpability and personal mitigation. A two-year disqualification is appropriate.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Disqualification order of five years quashed and substituted with a two-year disqualification.
- Requirement to pass an extended driving test before driving again remains.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment