Subotic v Knezevic [2013] EWHC 3011 (QB) (14 October 2013)
The action was dismissed as an abuse of process because there was no substantial publication or effect on the claimant's reputation in England and Wales, and the litigation served no legitimate purpose in the jurisdiction. The evidence showed only minimal publication, no identified loss, and the real dispute concerned reputation in the Balkans, not in England and Wales.
- Citation
- [2013] EWHC 3011
- Parties
- Claimant: Stanko Subotic; Defendant: Ratko Knezevic
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 October 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Libel/defamation / Interlocutory Application and Dismissal for Abuse of Process
- Outcome
- Action dismissed as an abuse of process (Jameel abuse).
- Legal Topics
- Abuse of Process, Jameel Principle, Jurisdiction, Publication, Amendment of Pleadings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stanko Subotic
Claimant
Ratko Knezevic
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Libel/defamation / Interlocutory Application and Dismissal for Abuse of Process
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claim should be dismissed as a Jameel abuse of process due to minimal publication and lack of substantial tort in the jurisdiction
- 2 Whether to permit a further adjournment for the claimant to prepare and amend pleadings
- 3 Whether to allow re-re-amendment of the Particulars of Claim
Ratio Decidendi
The action was dismissed as an abuse of process because there was no substantial publication or effect on the claimant's reputation in England and Wales, and the litigation served no legitimate purpose in the jurisdiction. The evidence showed only minimal publication, no identified loss, and the real dispute concerned reputation in the Balkans, not in England and Wales.
Court Disposition
Action dismissed as an abuse of process (Jameel abuse).
Orders
- Refusal to adjourn the hearing.
- Refusal to permit re-re-amendment of the Particulars of Claim.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment