De Weever, R v
The Recorder erred in classifying the victim as vulnerable under the guidelines; however, the combination of aggravating features—planning, professionalism, use of force, high inconvenience, and poor response to previous sentences—justified moving the sentence to the top of the higher bracket. After applying credit...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Regina; Appellant: Rawle De Weever
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 April 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part; sentence reduced
- Legal Topics
- Theft From the Person, Sentencing Guidelines, Aggravating and Mitigating Factors, Vulnerable Victim, Credit for Guilty Plea
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecutor
Rawle De Weever
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether the victim was correctly classified as vulnerable under the sentencing guidelines
- 3 Appropriate starting point and range for sentence given the facts and aggravating features
Ratio Decidendi
The Recorder erred in classifying the victim as vulnerable under the guidelines; however, the combination of aggravating features—planning, professionalism, use of force, high inconvenience, and poor response to previous sentences—justified moving the sentence to the top of the higher bracket. After applying credit for the late guilty plea, the appropriate sentence was 10 months' imprisonment, less time on remand.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part; sentence reduced
Orders
- Sentence reduced to 10 months' imprisonment, less 132 days spent on remand
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment