Gore, R v [2009] EWCA Crim 1424 (14 July 2009)
Issuance of fixed penalty notices for lesser offences did not preclude subsequent prosecution for more serious offences when new evidence came to light; no abuse of process occurred as the statutory scheme and guidance did not bar such prosecution, and no unequivocal assurance was given to the appellants that they would not be prosecuted for other offences.
- Citation
- [2009] EWCA Crim 1424
- Parties
- Prosecutor: R; Appellant: Raymond Gore; Appellant: Timothy Maher
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 July 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Abuse of Process, Fixed Penalty Notices, Double Jeopardy, Grievous Bodily Harm, Public Order Offences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R
Prosecutor
Raymond Gore
Appellant
Timothy Maher
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether prosecution after issuance of fixed penalty notices for the same incident constitutes an abuse of process
- 2 Whether the fixed penalty notice precludes subsequent prosecution for more serious offences arising from the same facts
Ratio Decidendi
Issuance of fixed penalty notices for lesser offences did not preclude subsequent prosecution for more serious offences when new evidence came to light; no abuse of process occurred as the statutory scheme and guidance did not bar such prosecution, and no unequivocal assurance was given to the appellants that they would not be prosecuted for other offences.
Court Disposition
appeals dismissed
Orders
- Convictions of Raymond Gore and Timothy Maher upheld
- Sentencing to proceed as previously adjourned
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment