Hosking v Smallshaw [2009] EWHC 90137 (Costs) (25 March 2009)
The claim concluded prior to the hearing on 28 January 2008. The 15 May 2008 hearing was for fine-tuning the settlement and not a trial or contested hearing of an issue. Therefore, the success fee is limited to 12.5% for solicitors and 75% for counsel as per CPR 45.16 and 45.17.
- Citation
- [2009] EWHC 90137 (Costs)
- Parties
- Claimant: Richard Ian Hosking; Defendant: Raymond Smallshaw
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 March 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Assessment Following Personal Injury Settlement / Detailed Assessment of Costs
- Outcome
- Success fee limited to 12.5% for solicitors and 75% for counsel; claim for 100% success fee rejected.
- Legal Topics
- Conditional Fee Agreements, Success Fees, CPR 45, Road Traffic Accidents, Costs Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Richard Ian Hosking
Claimant
Raymond Smallshaw
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Costs Assessment Following Personal Injury Settlement / Detailed Assessment of Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the success fee for the claimant's solicitors and counsel should be 100% or 12.5% under CPR 45.16 and 45.17
Ratio Decidendi
The claim concluded prior to the hearing on 28 January 2008. The 15 May 2008 hearing was for fine-tuning the settlement and not a trial or contested hearing of an issue. Therefore, the success fee is limited to 12.5% for solicitors and 75% for counsel as per CPR 45.16 and 45.17.
Court Disposition
Success fee limited to 12.5% for solicitors and 75% for counsel; claim for 100% success fee rejected.
Orders
- Claimant's solicitors' success fee limited to 12.5%
- Counsel's success fee limited to 75%
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment