RCW v A Local Authority (No.2): Re SB
Adoption by RCW is in SB’s best interests as professional assessments confirm her ability to parent with appropriate support, and the child is thriving in her care; visual impairment alone is not a bar to adoption where welfare is secured.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: RCW; Respondent: A Local Authority (LBX); Respondent: SB (by CAFCASS her Guardian)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 July 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Application / Final Judgment on Adoption Order
- Outcome
- Adoption order granted in favour of RCW
- Legal Topics
- Adoption, Disability and Parenting, Best Interests of the Child, Human Rights Act Injunctions
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
RCW
Applicant
A Local Authority (LBX)
Respondent
SB (by CAFCASS her Guardian)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Adoption Application / Final Judgment on Adoption Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether adoption by a visually impaired applicant is in the best interests of the child
- 2 Whether the local authority's initial decision to remove the child was justified
- 3 What support arrangements are necessary for the applicant to parent effectively
Ratio Decidendi
Adoption by RCW is in SB’s best interests as professional assessments confirm her ability to parent with appropriate support, and the child is thriving in her care; visual impairment alone is not a bar to adoption where welfare is secured.
Court Disposition
Adoption order granted in favour of RCW
Orders
- RCW to continue support from Focal Point UK for 12 months
- LBX to reimburse RCW for majority of Focal Point UK costs (£10,000)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment