C (A Child) v XYZ County Council & Anor
The Adoption and Children Act 2002 does not impose an absolute duty on the local authority to make enquiries of the extended family or father unless it is in the child's interests. The judge below misdirected himself by holding there was such a duty. The paramount consideration is the child's welfare, and in this case, the evidence did not justify delaying adoption for further enquiries. Non-disclosure to the father and grandparents does not violate Article 8 ECHR as the father has no family life with the child and the grandparents' rights are not breached if the child's welfare requires non-disclosure.
- Parties
- Applicant: Re. C (A child); First Respondent: XYZ County Council; Second Respondent: E. C.
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 November 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Adoption Procedure, Child Welfare, Parental Consent, Disclosure to Birth Family, Article 8 ECHR
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Re. C (A child)
Applicant
XYZ County Council
First Respondent
E. C.
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Adoption and Children Act 2002 imposes a duty on the local authority to make enquiries of a child's extended family or father about the possibility of their providing long-term care when the mother wishes the child to be adopted
- 2 How the court's discretion should be exercised regarding contacting the extended family or father in such cases
- 3 Whether non-disclosure to the birth family or father violates Article 8 ECHR
Ratio Decidendi
The Adoption and Children Act 2002 does not impose an absolute duty on the local authority to make enquiries of the extended family or father unless it is in the child's interests. The judge below misdirected himself by holding there was such a duty. The paramount consideration is the child's welfare, and in this case, the evidence did not justify delaying adoption for further enquiries. Non-disclosure to the father and grandparents does not violate Article 8 ECHR as the father has no family life with the child and the grandparents' rights are not breached if the child's welfare requires non-disclosure.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Order of Judge Taylor set aside
- Local Authority and Guardian directed to take no steps to identify or inform the father or introduce E to her grandparents or assess them as carers
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment