C (A Child) v XYZ County Council & Anor

C (A Child) v XYZ County Council & Anor

The Adoption and Children Act 2002 does not impose an absolute duty on the local authority to make enquiries of the extended family or father unless it is in the child's interests. The judge below misdirected himself by holding there was such a duty. The paramount consideration is the child's welfare, and in this case, the evidence did not justify delaying adoption for further enquiries. Non-disclosure to the father and grandparents does not violate Article 8 ECHR as the father has no family life with the child and the grandparents' rights are not breached if the child's welfare requires non-disclosure.

Parties
Applicant: Re. C (A child); First Respondent: XYZ County Council; Second Respondent: E. C.
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
23 November 2007
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Adoption Procedure, Child Welfare, Parental Consent, Disclosure to Birth Family, Article 8 ECHR

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 18 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Re. C (A child)

Applicant

XYZ County Council

First Respondent

E. C.

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the Adoption and Children Act 2002 imposes a duty on the local authority to make enquiries of a child's extended family or father about the possibility of their providing long-term care when the mother wishes the child to be adopted
  2. 2 How the court's discretion should be exercised regarding contacting the extended family or father in such cases
  3. 3 Whether non-disclosure to the birth family or father violates Article 8 ECHR

Ratio Decidendi

The Adoption and Children Act 2002 does not impose an absolute duty on the local authority to make enquiries of the extended family or father unless it is in the child's interests. The judge below misdirected himself by holding there was such a duty. The paramount consideration is the child's welfare, and in this case, the evidence did not justify delaying adoption for further enquiries. Non-disclosure to the father and grandparents does not violate Article 8 ECHR as the father has no family life with the child and the grandparents' rights are not breached if the child's welfare requires non-disclosure.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Order of Judge Taylor set aside
  • Local Authority and Guardian directed to take no steps to identify or inform the father or introduce E to her grandparents or assess them as carers