Reading Borough Council v Miss Angela D & Ors [2006] EWHC 1465 (Fam) (20 June 2006)
Police officers serving in a child protection unit may use information from documents disclosed by a local authority for both child protection and criminal investigation purposes, but use of the actual documents in criminal proceedings requires the court's permission. The 2005 Rules distinguish between information and documents; information may be shared, but documents filed with the court remain under court control. Partial waiver of legal privilege does not amount to total waiver.
- Citation
- [2006] EWHC 1465 (Fam)
- Parties
- Applicant: Reading Borough Council; First Respondent: Miss Angela D; Second Respondent: Gary G; Third Respondent: Shannon D, Callum D, Kaydon D (Minors) (through the Children's Guardian – Melanie B); Intervener: The Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 June 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law – Care Proceedings / Application by Police for Leave to Use Documents From Care Proceedings
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure of Documents, Confidentiality in Family Proceedings, Use of Family Court Documents in Criminal Investigations, Legal Professional Privilege, Public Interest Immunity
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Reading Borough Council
Applicant
Miss Angela D
First Respondent
Gary G
Second Respondent
Shannon D, Callum D, Kaydon D (Minors) (through the Children's Guardian – Melanie B)
Third Respondent
The Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Family Law – Care Proceedings / Application by Police for Leave to Use Documents From Care Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether police may use documents from family care proceedings for criminal investigation and child protection purposes without court's permission under the Family Proceedings (Amendment No 4) Rules 2005
- 2 Distinction between use of information and use of documents from family proceedings
- 3 Scope of legal professional privilege in disclosed documents
Ratio Decidendi
Police officers serving in a child protection unit may use information from documents disclosed by a local authority for both child protection and criminal investigation purposes, but use of the actual documents in criminal proceedings requires the court's permission. The 2005 Rules distinguish between information and documents; information may be shared, but documents filed with the court remain under court control. Partial waiver of legal privilege does not amount to total waiver.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Permission granted for the police to use the documents disclosed for both child protection and criminal investigation purposes.
- Clarification that information from such documents may be used without further leave, but use of the documents themselves in criminal proceedings requires court permission.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment