Reading Borough Council v Miss Angela D & Ors
Police officers serving in a child protection unit may receive and use information from care proceedings for both child protection and criminal investigation purposes without court leave, but use of actual documents filed with the court for criminal proceedings requires court permission; information and documents remain confidential and subject to public interest immunity; legal professional privilege in statements is only waived to the extent of the purpose for which disclosure was made.
- Parties
- Applicant: Reading Borough Council; First Respondent: Miss Angela D; Second Respondent: Gary G; Third Respondent: Shannon D, Callum D, Kaydon D (Minors) (through the Children’s Guardian – Melanie B); Intervener: The Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 June 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law – Care Proceedings / Interlocutory Application for Disclosure of Documents to Police
- Outcome
- Application granted; permission given for police to use the documents for criminal investigation purposes.
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure of Documents, Use of Confidential Information, Inter Agency Cooperation, Legal Professional Privilege, Public Interest Immunity
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Reading Borough Council
Applicant
Miss Angela D
First Respondent
Gary G
Second Respondent
Shannon D, Callum D, Kaydon D (Minors) (through the Children’s Guardian – Melanie B)
Third Respondent
The Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Family Law – Care Proceedings / Interlocutory Application for Disclosure of Documents to Police
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether police may use documents from care proceedings for child protection and/or criminal investigation purposes without court leave under the Family Proceedings (Amendment No 4) Rules 2005
- 2 Distinction between use of information and use of documents from family proceedings
- 3 Effect of legal professional privilege on disclosure of statements
Ratio Decidendi
Police officers serving in a child protection unit may receive and use information from care proceedings for both child protection and criminal investigation purposes without court leave, but use of actual documents filed with the court for criminal proceedings requires court permission; information and documents remain confidential and subject to public interest immunity; legal professional privilege in statements is only waived to the extent of the purpose for which disclosure was made.
Court Disposition
Application granted; permission given for police to use the documents for criminal investigation purposes.
Orders
- Permission granted for police to use the five specified documents for criminal investigation purposes.
- Guidance issued on distinction between use of information and documents, and on procedures for future applications.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment