Viavi Solutions UK Ltd v Viavi Solutions Pensions Trustee UK Ltd & Anor
The evidence, including pre- and post-execution documents and conduct, convincingly demonstrates that the inclusion of minimum pension increase underpins in rule 61.4 was an error and not intended by the parties; rectification is appropriate to remove the underpins and restore trustee discretion.
- Parties
- Claimant: Viavi Solutions UK Ltd; First Defendant: Viavi Solutions Pension Trustee UK Ltd; Second Defendant (representative Member): Jeffrey Cottrell
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 September 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Claim for Rectification / Judgment on Application Under CPR 24.2
- Outcome
- Order for rectification granted; other orders in draft order made.
- Legal Topics
- Rectification of Pension Deeds, Trustee Discretion, Errors in Pension Scheme Rules
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Viavi Solutions UK Ltd
Claimant
Viavi Solutions Pension Trustee UK Ltd
First Defendant
Jeffrey Cottrell
Second Defendant (representative Member)
Procedural Posture
Claim for Rectification / Judgment on Application Under CPR 24.2
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether rule 61.4 of the 1999 Deed and Rules was drafted in error by including minimum pension increase underpins
- 2 Whether rectification should be granted to remove the underpins and restore trustee discretion
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence, including pre- and post-execution documents and conduct, convincingly demonstrates that the inclusion of minimum pension increase underpins in rule 61.4 was an error and not intended by the parties; rectification is appropriate to remove the underpins and restore trustee discretion.
Court Disposition
Order for rectification granted; other orders in draft order made.
Orders
- Rectification of rule 61.4 of the 1999 Deed and Rules to remove minimum pension increase underpins and restore trustee discretion.
- Orders for representation granted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment