Eagle v Redlime Ltd [2011] EWHC 838 (QB) (04 April 2011)
The claim is statute barred because, by 29 October 2006, the claimant had sufficient knowledge of the material facts about the damage and that it was attributable to the defendant's acts or omissions, such that it was reasonable to begin investigating a claim. The later expert report did not delay the start of the limitation period under s14A Limitation Act 1980.
- Citation
- [2011] EWHC 838 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Clinton Eagle; Defendant: Redlime Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 April 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Tort Claim (negligence) – Preliminary Issue on Limitation / Judgment on Preliminary Issue Regarding Limitation Under S14 a Limitation Act 1980
- Outcome
- Claim in tort is statute barred under s14A Limitation Act 1980.
- Legal Topics
- Limitation of Actions, Negligence, Construction Disputes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Clinton Eagle
Claimant
Redlime Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Tort Claim (negligence) – Preliminary Issue on Limitation / Judgment on Preliminary Issue Regarding Limitation Under S14 a Limitation Act 1980
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant's tort claim against the defendant is statute barred under section 14A of the Limitation Act 1980
- 2 When the claimant had the knowledge required for bringing an action for damages in respect of the relevant damage
Ratio Decidendi
The claim is statute barred because, by 29 October 2006, the claimant had sufficient knowledge of the material facts about the damage and that it was attributable to the defendant's acts or omissions, such that it was reasonable to begin investigating a claim. The later expert report did not delay the start of the limitation period under s14A Limitation Act 1980.
Court Disposition
Claim in tort is statute barred under s14A Limitation Act 1980.
Orders
- Claim dismissed as statute barred
- Parties to seek to agree an order including costs; in default, court to determine outstanding issues
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment