R v Reece Barlow

R v Reece Barlow

The original period of disqualification was manifestly excessive and failed to adequately reflect the appellant's prospects of rehabilitation; a substituted period of 53 months is appropriate.

Parties
Prosecution: Rex; Appellant: Reece Barlow
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
19 February 2025
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal allowed in part
Legal Topics
Dangerous Driving, Failure to Provide Specimen, Stalking, Sentencing, Driving Disqualification
Criminal Law Dangerous Driving Failure to Provide Specimen Stalking Sentencing Driving Disqualification

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

Reece Barlow

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the period of driving disqualification imposed was manifestly excessive

Ratio Decidendi

The original period of disqualification was manifestly excessive and failed to adequately reflect the appellant's prospects of rehabilitation; a substituted period of 53 months is appropriate.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed in part

Orders

  • The period of driving disqualification is quashed and substituted with a period of 53 months.
  • All other aspects of sentence remain unaltered, including the requirement for an extended driving test before eligibility for a licence.