Watkins & Anor v R. (Rev 2)
The sentences imposed reflected the shocking depravity and multiplicity of aggravating factors, and the principle of totality was properly applied. The sentences were not manifestly excessive, and the judge's assessment of dangerousness and seriousness was correct. Ambiguity in the extended licence period was resolved in favour of Watkins, and the Crown Court record was ordered to be amended accordingly.
- Parties
- 1st Appellant: Ian Watkins; 2nd Appellant: P; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Applications for leave to appeal against sentence refused.
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Offences, Sentencing, Child Protection, Conspiracy, Dangerous Offender, Totality Principle
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ian Watkins
1st Appellant
P
2nd Appellant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentences imposed were manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether the principle of totality was properly applied
- 3 Whether appropriate credit was given for guilty pleas
Ratio Decidendi
The sentences imposed reflected the shocking depravity and multiplicity of aggravating factors, and the principle of totality was properly applied. The sentences were not manifestly excessive, and the judge's assessment of dangerousness and seriousness was correct. Ambiguity in the extended licence period was resolved in favour of Watkins, and the Crown Court record was ordered to be amended accordingly.
Court Disposition
Applications for leave to appeal against sentence refused.
Orders
- Crown Court record to be amended to reflect the correct extended licence period for Watkins.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment