Welsh (Snr) & 17 Ors, R v (Rev 1)
Consent of the Attorney General must be obtained prior to sending for trial under s51 Crime and Disorder Act 1998; applications for extension of time fail as no substantial injustice is demonstrated and there is no change in law, only improved understanding.
- Parties
- Appellant: Regina; Respondents: Welsh (Snr) and 17 Others
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 September 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- applications for extension of time refused
- Legal Topics
- Consent to Prosecute, Extension of Time, Nullity of Proceedings, Change of Law, Substantial Injustice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Appellant
Welsh (Snr) and 17 Others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether proceedings instituted without Attorney General's consent are nullities under ss1A and 4 Criminal Law Act 1977
- 2 Whether extensions of time for leave to appeal should be granted given late applications
- 3 Whether a change in CPS guidance constitutes a change in law or improved understanding
Ratio Decidendi
Consent of the Attorney General must be obtained prior to sending for trial under s51 Crime and Disorder Act 1998; applications for extension of time fail as no substantial injustice is demonstrated and there is no change in law, only improved understanding.
Court Disposition
applications for extension of time refused
Orders
- applications for extension of time to appeal against conviction are rejected
- case of S adjourned for further submissions as consent was never obtained
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment