Cheung, R. v
The judge's directions to the jury were inadequate and confused the prosecution's burden of proof with the defendant's burden under the statutory defence, leading to a real risk that the jury approached the statutory defence wrongly. The convictions on counts 2 to 8 are unsafe and must be quashed.
- Parties
- Applicant/appellant: Ping Chen Cheung; Respondent: Regina (The Crown)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 August 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal Conviction and Sentence; Determination of Retrial
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; convictions on counts 2 to 8 quashed; no retrial ordered; conviction and sentence on count 1 stand.
- Legal Topics
- Possession, Extreme Pornography, Statutory Defence, Directions to Jury, Retrial
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ping Chen Cheung
Applicant/appellant
Regina (The Crown)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal Conviction and Sentence; Determination of Retrial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge's directions to the jury on possession and the statutory defence under section 65(2)(b) of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 were adequate and correct
- 2 Whether the conviction on counts 2 to 8 is safe
Ratio Decidendi
The judge's directions to the jury were inadequate and confused the prosecution's burden of proof with the defendant's burden under the statutory defence, leading to a real risk that the jury approached the statutory defence wrongly. The convictions on counts 2 to 8 are unsafe and must be quashed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; convictions on counts 2 to 8 quashed; no retrial ordered; conviction and sentence on count 1 stand.
Orders
- Convictions on counts 2 to 8 quashed
- No retrial to be held
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment