ANP, R. v [2022] EWCA Crim 1111 (28 July 2022)
The judge erred in law by treating the loss of evidence as creating an 'evidential vacuum' and by failing to assess whether the remaining evidence was sufficient for a fair trial; proper judicial directions could address any prejudice; a fair trial remained possible and a stay was not justified.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] EWCA Crim 1111
- Parties
- Applicant: Regina; Respondent: ANP
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Prosecution Application for Leave to Appeal Against Terminating Ruling (stay of Proceedings)
- Outcome
- Prosecution's appeal allowed; stay of proceedings reversed; trial to proceed before a different judge.
- Legal Topics
- Abuse of Process, Stay of Proceedings, Lost Evidence, Fair Trial, Sexual Offences
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Applicant
ANP
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Prosecution Application for Leave to Appeal Against Terminating Ruling (stay of Proceedings)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the loss of evidence (samples and underwear) made a fair trial impossible and justified a stay of proceedings as an abuse of process
- 2 Whether the trial judge erred in law in granting a stay
Ratio Decidendi
The judge erred in law by treating the loss of evidence as creating an 'evidential vacuum' and by failing to assess whether the remaining evidence was sufficient for a fair trial; proper judicial directions could address any prejudice; a fair trial remained possible and a stay was not justified.
Court Disposition
Prosecution's appeal allowed; stay of proceedings reversed; trial to proceed before a different judge.
Orders
- Leave to appeal granted.
- Judge's ruling staying proceedings reversed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment