Regina v ANP

Regina v ANP

The judge erred in finding that the loss of evidence created an 'evidential vacuum' making a fair trial impossible. The remaining evidence (complainant's account, CCTV, witness evidence, and scientific evidence favourable to the accused) was sufficient for a fair trial, and any prejudice could be addressed by appropriate judicial directions. The stay was therefore wrongly granted and the trial should proceed.

Parties
Applicant: Regina; Respondent: ANP
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
28 July 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Terminating Ruling
Outcome
prosecution's appeal allowed; stay of proceedings reversed; trial to proceed before a different judge
Legal Topics
Abuse of Process, Stay of Proceedings, Loss of Evidence, Fair Trial Rights, Sexual Offences, Reporting Restrictions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Applicant

ANP

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Terminating Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the loss of evidence (samples and underwear) made a fair trial impossible for the accused
  2. 2 Whether the judge erred in granting a stay of proceedings as an abuse of process

Ratio Decidendi

The judge erred in finding that the loss of evidence created an 'evidential vacuum' making a fair trial impossible. The remaining evidence (complainant's account, CCTV, witness evidence, and scientific evidence favourable to the accused) was sufficient for a fair trial, and any prejudice could be addressed by appropriate judicial directions. The stay was therefore wrongly granted and the trial should proceed.

Court Disposition

prosecution's appeal allowed; stay of proceedings reversed; trial to proceed before a different judge

Orders

  • Leave to appeal granted
  • Judge's ruling to stay proceedings reversed