Regina v ANP
The judge erred in finding that the loss of evidence created an 'evidential vacuum' making a fair trial impossible. The remaining evidence (complainant's account, CCTV, witness evidence, and scientific evidence favourable to the accused) was sufficient for a fair trial, and any prejudice could be addressed by appropriate judicial directions. The stay was therefore wrongly granted and the trial should proceed.
- Parties
- Applicant: Regina; Respondent: ANP
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Terminating Ruling
- Outcome
- prosecution's appeal allowed; stay of proceedings reversed; trial to proceed before a different judge
- Legal Topics
- Abuse of Process, Stay of Proceedings, Loss of Evidence, Fair Trial Rights, Sexual Offences, Reporting Restrictions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Applicant
ANP
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Terminating Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the loss of evidence (samples and underwear) made a fair trial impossible for the accused
- 2 Whether the judge erred in granting a stay of proceedings as an abuse of process
Ratio Decidendi
The judge erred in finding that the loss of evidence created an 'evidential vacuum' making a fair trial impossible. The remaining evidence (complainant's account, CCTV, witness evidence, and scientific evidence favourable to the accused) was sufficient for a fair trial, and any prejudice could be addressed by appropriate judicial directions. The stay was therefore wrongly granted and the trial should proceed.
Court Disposition
prosecution's appeal allowed; stay of proceedings reversed; trial to proceed before a different judge
Orders
- Leave to appeal granted
- Judge's ruling to stay proceedings reversed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment