DS & TS, R v [2015] EWCA Crim 662 (21 April 2015)
Despite grave and systemic failures in disclosure by the prosecution and police, the materiality of undisclosed documents was limited and a fair trial remained possible. Balancing the public interest in prosecuting grave offences and the integrity of the justice system, the stay was not justified; proceedings should continue, and sanctions may be imposed against the CPS and police.
- Citation
- [2015] EWCA Crim 662
- Parties
- Appellant: Regina; Respondent: DS; Respondent: TS
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 April 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Stay for Abuse of Process
- Outcome
- Stay set aside; proceedings to continue
- Legal Topics
- Abuse of Process, Disclosure Obligations, Fair Trial, Stay of Proceedings, Wasted Costs, Police Misconduct, CPS Failures
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Appellant
DS
Respondent
TS
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Stay for Abuse of Process
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether grave failures in disclosure by prosecution and police justify a stay of proceedings for abuse of process
- 2 Whether a fair trial remains possible despite disclosure failures
- 3 Appropriate sanctions for prosecution failures
Ratio Decidendi
Despite grave and systemic failures in disclosure by the prosecution and police, the materiality of undisclosed documents was limited and a fair trial remained possible. Balancing the public interest in prosecuting grave offences and the integrity of the justice system, the stay was not justified; proceedings should continue, and sanctions may be imposed against the CPS and police.
Court Disposition
Stay set aside; proceedings to continue
Orders
- Further disclosure to be made by 20 March 2015
- Statements from Chief Constable and Chief Crown Prosecutor to be provided
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment